Score whether a specific fund is worth your time across stage, check, thesis, lead behaviour and warm path.
The form starts with editable example values. Check the fit as-is, or enter the fund you are evaluating first.
A fund can invest in your space and still be wrong for you: too late-stage, too small a check, unable to lead, or conflicted.
The single biggest filter. A seed fund writing small checks cannot lead a large Series A-style raise.
Core thesis means they are hunting for you. Adjacent means you will spend the meeting educating.
A strong intro and an actively deploying fund turn a maybe into a meeting.
Eight weighted dimensions, each scored from your inputs, combine into a single 0-100 read.
# core components stage_fit · check_fit · thesis_fit geo_fit · lead_fit · conflict_risk recent_activity · warm_path fit = sum(dimension x weight) call = pitch / research / deprioritize
Stage, check size and thesis carry the most weight because they are the hardest constraints to overcome.
Where confidence is blocked, the tool tells you what to research instead of pretending certainty.
That can mean thesis fit, or it can mean an active conflict. Check before you pitch.
A famous multi-stage fund may only follow at your stage. Name recognition is not lead capacity.
An intro to someone outside your sector can burn the connection. Fit is person-level too.
Investor fit combines stage, check size, thesis, geography, lead behaviour, recent activity, conflicts, and whether you have a realistic path in.
Yes. If they do not lead at your stage, write the wrong check size, or already have a close competitor, they may waste scarce fundraising time.
RoundOS enriches every fund in your pipeline with fund and person dossiers, recent signals, conflicts, and warm-path context.